Bibliographic Information for "Hugon 2013"

Bibliographic records for Hugon 2013

• Show MODS
  <mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><titleInfo><title>Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (&lt;i&gt;thal 'gyur&lt;/i&gt;): The Nature, Function, and Form of Consequence Statements</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (&lt;i&gt;thal 'gyur&lt;/i&gt;)</title></titleInfo><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre authority="local">journalArticle</genre><name type="personal"><namePart type="family">Hugon</namePart><namePart type="given">Pascale</namePart><role><roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm></role></name><identifier type="doi">10.1007/s10781-013-9205-4</identifier><location><url usage="primary display" dateLastAccessed="2021-08-11 00:00:00">https://www.jstor.org/stable/43496655</url></location><abstract>This paper presents the main aspects of the views of the Tibetan logician Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109-1169) on argumentation "by consequence" (thal 'gyur, Skt. prasaṅga) based on his exposition of the topic in the fifth chapter of his Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel and on a parallel excursus in his commentary on Dharmakīrti's Pramānaviniścaya. It aims at circumscribing primarily the nature and function of consequences (thal 'gyur/thal ba) for this author—in particular the distinction between "proving consequences" and "refuting consequences"—and the form prescribed for their enunciation in the context of debate. In addition to pointing out differences with the systems adopted by his predecessors, contemporaries and successors, the paper also discusses some of the similarities and differences between Phya pa's understanding of argumentation by consequence and the notion of reductio ad absurdum in Western logic.</abstract><subject><topic>Phyapa Website</topic></subject><subject><topic>checked</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><genre authority="marcgt">journal</genre><part><detail type="volume"><number>41.6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>671</start><end>702</end></extent></part><originInfo><dateIssued>2013</dateIssued><issuance>continuing</issuance></originInfo><identifier type="issn">0022-1791</identifier><titleInfo><title>Journal of Indian Philosophy</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JIP</title></titleInfo></relatedItem></mods>
• Show BibTeX
  @article{hugon_phya_2013, title = {Phya pa {Chos} kyi seng ge on {Argumentation} by {Consequence} (\textit{thal 'gyur}): {The} {Nature}, {Function}, and {Form} of {Consequence} {Statements}}, volume = {41.6}, issn = {0022-1791}, shorttitle = {Phya pa {Chos} kyi seng ge on {Argumentation} by {Consequence} (\textit{thal 'gyur})}, url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/43496655}, doi = {10.1007/s10781-013-9205-4}, abstract = {This paper presents the main aspects of the views of the Tibetan logician Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109-1169) on argumentation "by consequence" (thal 'gyur, Skt. prasaṅga) based on his exposition of the topic in the fifth chapter of his Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel and on a parallel excursus in his commentary on Dharmakīrti's Pramānaviniścaya. It aims at circumscribing primarily the nature and function of consequences (thal 'gyur/thal ba) for this author—in particular the distinction between "proving consequences" and "refuting consequences"—and the form prescribed for their enunciation in the context of debate. In addition to pointing out differences with the systems adopted by his predecessors, contemporaries and successors, the paper also discusses some of the similarities and differences between Phya pa's understanding of argumentation by consequence and the notion of reductio ad absurdum in Western logic.}, urldate = {2021-08-11}, journal = {Journal of Indian Philosophy}, author = {Hugon, Pascale}, year = {2013}, keywords = {Phyapa Website, checked}, pages = {671--702}, }
• Show Source
  @article{hugon_phya_2013, title = {Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (\textit{thal 'gyur}): The Nature, Function, and Form of Consequence Statements}, volume = {41.6}, issn = {0022-1791}, url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/43496655}, doi = {10.1007/s10781-013-9205-4}, shorttitle = {Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (\textit{thal 'gyur})}, abstract = {This paper presents the main aspects of the views of the Tibetan logician Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109-1169) on argumentation "by consequence" (thal 'gyur, Skt. prasaṅga) based on his exposition of the topic in the fifth chapter of his Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel and on a parallel excursus in his commentary on Dharmakīrti's Pramānaviniścaya. It aims at circumscribing primarily the nature and function of consequences (thal 'gyur/thal ba) for this author—in particular the distinction between "proving consequences" and "refuting consequences"—and the form prescribed for their enunciation in the context of debate. In addition to pointing out differences with the systems adopted by his predecessors, contemporaries and successors, the paper also discusses some of the similarities and differences between Phya pa's understanding of argumentation by consequence and the notion of reductio ad absurdum in Western logic.}, pages = {671--702}, journaltitle = {Journal of Indian Philosophy}, shortjournal = {{JIP}}, author = {Hugon, Pascale}, urldate = {2021-08-11}, date = {2013}, note = {Publisher: Springer}, keywords = {Phyapa Website, checked}, }